[HCS-D] New postfix, new spam filtering
philz at hcs.harvard.edu
Sat May 21 11:58:47 EDT 2005
> I've spoken to Matt about this, and we're considering getting rid of the
> secondary MX record. Given our good uptime track record, and the fact
What good uptime track record? ;)
> that every properly implemented mail server is more than capable of
> queuing temporarily undeliverable mail on its own, I think this is
> perfectly fine -- does anyone have any very loud objections to this? It
> would drastically decrease the amount of spam we get.
I really like having eecs back us up--and I should note that
we're their backup mx, I think...
(Note new e-mail)
Philip Zeyliger * zeyliger at post.harvard.edu * Dunster '04
``I figured that all out once, and for six months I never slept
with the electric light off. That was another bright idea.''
-- Ernest Hemingway, _The Sun Also Rises_
More information about the hcs-discuss