*HCS* Fishbowl + Least-Sucky-Linux Distroy
palmer at azuen.net
Mon Oct 16 10:16:15 EDT 2000
>On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 02:21:33AM -0400, Brendan Connell wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Chris Palmer wrote:
>> > Why not FreeBSD? that's what aerator runs, and it's NFS isn't broken,
>> > among other things.
> > Uh-oh... did somebody say the "B-word" again??
Heh. Well, in this case it means "Does not work" so I feel justified.
> > But yeah, FreeBSD sounds like it's worth considering. Or OpenBSD, even--
>> then, maybe the fishbowl wouldn't get HaX0red by 3133+ m1ddLe Sk00l
>> KiDDeeZ every week...
>We don't want OpenBSD, I don't think. We also don't want RedHat :-)
Both are true. For one, FreeBSD has linux binary compatibility,
which means you
can still have StarOffice on them, among other things. As far as I
has this not.
More information about the hcs-discuss