*HCS* Final Call for Ignitaries!
dholland at hcs.harvard.edu
Mon Oct 2 17:54:58 EDT 2000
> > That article is no more valid now than it was the last four or five
> > times we went around on this.
To be specific, most of the things it cites are implementation defects
(eg, if you add Reply-To: pointing to the list, any existing reply-to
header should be promoted to From:) and it's also less than perfectly
aware of how mail clients actually work.
> Well, I did say it was a standard flamewar topic. I don't remember seeing
> it on hcs-discuss in the past couple years... but obviously I'm not a fogy
> like you. :)
This is true. Actually, I don't remember precisely what the last time
this came up was, but I don't think it was all that long ago.
> > And please don't troll on hcs-discuss.
> I'm sure YOU'd never dream of doing that. =)
Of course not.
> Anyway, isn't trolling what hcs-discuss is meant for?
I hear Emacs is a nice editor. :-)
More information about the hcs-discuss